New York Times Needs to Release Trump Audio

Since Donald Trump announced his run for president on June 16th of 2015 we have all witnessed his meteoric rise to political stardom as from the start he has been saying everything the American people want to hear. From bringing jobs back to the United States from overseas to addressing the illegal immigration issue, Trump seems to have the answers to all of the problems plaguing our country. There's only one problem, what experience does this individual have that truly makes him a viable candidate to become leader of the free world.

I agree it can be easy to get caught up in much of Trump’s rhetoric as he plays on the emotions of the American people much like what many liberal Democrats do and it is essential we all look past the emotional aspect of what he speaks about and get at the heart of what it is he stands for. We must vet Trump like we would any other candidate vying for the office of the president and be sure we hold him accountable. As is the case we must look into any and all allegations regarding his stance on things like immigration, a topic he speaks very strongly about.

According to BuzzFeed,

The New York Times is sitting on an audio recording that some of its staff believes could deal a serious blow to Donald Trump, who, in an off-the-record meeting with the newspaper, called into question whether he would stand by his own immigration views.

I get it that the source in question here is indeed the liberals beloved New York Times but nonetheless the Donald did an interview with them and I don’t necessarily think they would just make up the possibility that they have in their possession a recording like this.  The question then becomes do that have the balls to release this recording.  Just recently there reports surfaced that Trump intends to consider lobbying to have libel laws changed in this country as much of the reporting on him lately hasn’t been what one would call positive.  This would be the ultimate test as of late, a test that would really shed some light on Trump’s true colors with regards to how he would address a media outlet that would be willing to release some truly damaging audio against him.

Trump appeared on Hannity last night to address the concerns brought about by the New York Times and yet again we are met with his typical vagueness. Trump never really seems to get at the heart of the issues, he constantly speaks in platitudes explaining that we’re just going to get it done.  Never does he say how we are going to get it done, what the ramifications would be to the American people to fund said projects, and what the exact long term goals of the project include.

View More: Politics and Power News|Live News|More News Videos

According to Politico,

“The New York Times is claiming today that they had an off-the-record conversation with you in January,” Hannity started.

“We had a board meeting, it was off-the-record, suddenly they leak it, it’s all over the place,” Trump said.

“They said it’s negotiable on the wall,” Hannity said in reference to Trump’s stance on Mexican immigration and his oft-stated promise to build a border wall.

“By the way it is negotiable. Things are negotiable,” Trump said. “I’ll make the wall 2 feet shorter or something.”

Trump was quick to add that the negotiation does not include nixing the idea altogether.

“Building it? Not negotiable.”

“Would it be negotiable about the 11 million?” Hannity pressed. “Maybe let some people stay if they register in a period of time?”

“I would say this,” Trump answered. “We will work out some system that’s fair, but we either have a country or we don’t. We need a border. We need a wall.”

So Trump is upset with the sudden leak from the New York Times, well Mr. Trump welcome to politics.  You want to run for President this is what you’re faced with and you simply cannot run around here crying about how you want to change libel laws because you don’t like the news coverage about you. And Trump finishes his time with Hannity like he does most of his speeches, concentrating on one of the issues that is near and dear to the American people, building the border wall.  I truly hope that if elected he is able to do what he is promising. I guess we’ll find out.

-Young Conservative

@Steve0423

www.facebook.com/youngconservativeshow

www.news.youngconservative.net

Freddie Gray's Toxicology Tests Are In

Did Freddie Gray Have Drugs in his system at the time of his death? Recent reports are confirming that both heroin and marijuana in his system when preliminary toxicology reports were performed!

According to The Right Scoop,

"Sean Hannity interviewed someone identifying himself as a Baltimore cop who says the preliminary toxicology report on Freddie Gray tested positive for heroin and marijuana. Further, contrary to early reports, the cop says that he was observed in a possible drug deal before the cops tried to apprehend him."

So add this report to the fact that Freddie Gray had a rap sheet a mile long and there is definitely probable cause to at least confront him to find out what he was doing.

Not only did he have a rap sheet a mile long,  he ran when he made eye contact with the cops. There is your reasoning as to how the altercation that lead to his unfortunate occurred.

Young Conservative
@steve0423
Facebook.com/whytheleftisntright
Rebelmouse.com/YoungConservative
#tcot #RedNationRising #PJNET

Sean Hannity Schools Ferguson Protester on the Facts of the Mike Brown Shooting

Yet again tragic events have taken place in Ferguson, Missouri as two officers were shot last night while standing guard outside the police headquarters overseeing what had been a peaceful gathering of protesters.  Before long shots rang out with one officer being shot in the face and another in the back from what sounded like a sniper type rifle.  Due to the supposed gun involved in the shooting the question has been posed as to whether or not this was a professional style assassination attempt the likes of what recently took place in NYC.  Luckily this time the officers are expected to survive. 

What makes this incident even more terrifying is the fact that this shooting didn't really seem to have much of an affect on the people protesting in Ferguson.  You don't see any outrage from the protesters that two officers, who were there to protect the people's right to protest, were nearly killed. One would think that the protesters, of all people, would be upset with the fact that two of the officers protecting them and keeping the peace were literally gunned down. 

This shooting is a direct result though of the rhetoric being spewed from the Obama administration and Eric Holder's justice department. We see Obama and Holder constantly stirring the pot with regards to keeping the racial tensions alive in Ferguson as they have recently "uncovered racial bias" that has apparently run amok within the Ferguson police department. What makes this so pathetic is the fact that because they couldn't charge officer Wilson with a crime as he committed no crime, they have to make up another race based story to keep Ferguson on edge.  There has even been talk of disbanding the entire Ferguson police department which would leave the town with what?  Would the government then step in and literally police an American city?  Something that would be wholly unconstitutional and unprecedented in American history.

To top off the events that unfolded in Ferguson last night we see an interview Sean Hannity conducted with a moron named Ivory Ned.  This individual epitomizes the mindset of the Ferguson protester as he attempts to speak about the facts of the case, when in turn he really knows nothing about what was uncovered by Holder's justice department.  Mr. Hannity makes short work of that as he politely explains what was uncovered in the case that lead to Darren Wilson's exoneration.

Hannity read directly from the DOJ report:

Witness accounts suggesting that Brown was standing still with his hands raised in an unambiguous signal of surrender when Wilson shot Brown are inconsistent with the physical evidence, are otherwise not credible because of internal inconsistencies, or are not credible because of inconsistencies with other credible evidence. In contrast, Wilson’s account of Brown’s actions, if true, would establish that the shootings were not objectively unreasonable under the relevant Constitutional standards governing an officer’s use of deadly force. Multiple credible witnesses corroborate virtually every material aspect of Wilson’s account and are consistent with the physical evidence.

This interview was a perfect example of just what the majority of the brainwashed individuals of Ferguson seem to believe about the facts surrounding the Mike Brown / Darren Wilson incident. Couple that mentality with the constant bombardment of racial rhetoric being fed to them from our president and the justice department and  you have what we saw last night, innocent police officers gunned down for absolutely no reason whatsoever. So yes it is safe to say that both Obama and Holder have the blood of those police officers on their hands and they need to do something to rectify the situation before it gets out of hand yet again!

Young Conservative

@Steve0423

Facebook.com/WhyTheLeftIsntRight

#TCOT #RedNationRising #PJENT #FreedomWorks