I would
love for one person to make a valid argument with regards to where Obama gets
the authority to arbitrarily determine who is granted citizenship and who is
not.
According to Article 1, Section 8, Claus 4 of the United
States Constitution,
"The Congress shall have the power to establish a
uniform rule of naturalization."
As one can clearly see, although the President can't seem
to see this, the power of naturalization and in effect the subsequent dealings
with immigration and naturalization as a whole lies in Congress, not in the
hands of the President. Bottom line is the actions by this president to
take it upon himself to move forward with immigration policy without first
consulting Congress is unconstitutional and an impeachable offense.
Don't be fooled by this President's excuse that he must act
because Congress won't. It doesn't matter whether or not Congress is
acting or coming to a resolution on something the President decides is
important. He simply does not have the power to take over the powers of
Congress.
Today we are seeing the 5th circuit court of appeals take
up arguments over the validity of Obama's proposed immigration reform.
The mere fact that it has come to this is absolutely ridiculous! The
government is wasting tax payer’s money debating whether or not Obama can
deliberately act outside the confines of the Constitution.
A coalition of 26 states, led
by Texas sued to block the plan. The
hearing was on an appeal of a Texas judge's injunction.
The Justice Department argued
that Texas has no legal standing in the matter. Texas' solicitor general
countered that granting legal status to immigrants will be costly for Texas.
The judges did not rule and
took the case under advisement.
It is quite clear that more than half of the states are
extremely concerned with the possible effects of this proposed immigration
reform. If the immigration reform were to go through it would have a hug
effect on the states as the federal government plans on putting the burden of
taking care of the illegals solely on the states.
The states will have to
deal with providing schooling for the millions of new illegal alien students,
the states will have to deal with health concerns brought here by individuals
from third world countries, and the states will have to deal with issuing these
illegal aliens credentials that should only be provided to United States
citizens.
ABC News then goes on to explain,
Benjamin Mizer,
the Justice Department's principal deputy assistant attorney general, called
Texas' suit unprecedented and argued that immigration policy is a domain of the
federal government.
The whole reason the Texas suit is
"unprecedented" is because the actions of this President are also
unprecedented. Never before has a president taken it upon himself to rule
on immigration policy. And don't talk to me about Reagan, the immigration
bill that he signed into law back in 1986 was drafted and passed by Congress.
Therefore the immigration reform was Constitutional.
Yes immigration reform is a domain of
the federal government as stated by Benjamin Mizer, it's just not a domain of
the office of the President.
Young Conservative
@Steve0423
Facebook.com/WhyTheLeftIsntRight
RebelMouse.com/YoungConservative
#tcot #RedNationRising #PJNET
