Cruzzin Past Trump in Iowa

Big news this Sunday morning as it looks like Trump is not as infallible as many think he is.  Thus far I have been looking at the GOP field and giving everyone an equal shot in my eyes to win the Republican nomination for the president.  Too many people are buying into what is being fed to them via the mainstream media and are getting caught up in the hoopla that same media has created as they hang on every word Trump says.  I'll be the first to say that when Trump appears to screw up, somehow it only strengthens his stance in the polls and that just adds to is already over inflated ego.

Just a few examples of Trumps debacles...



In this particular instance we see Donald Trump literally mock handicapped individuals as he speaks about the Muslims that were celebrating in Jersey City, NJ shortly after the 9/11 attacks.  While his claim was later confirmed as video had surfaced showing the individuals indeed were celebrating, the problem is how Trump went about explaining this incident.  Do we really want an individual like this, who possesses such lack of couth, as the leader of the free world and one who will represent us around the world.

Again we see Trump on his high horse and this time he is literally mocking and belittling a fellow candidate.  In this instance it is about respect, or lack thereof, from an individual who has his sights on the highest office in this country.  When I look for someone who I would back as president of the United States, I look for someone who commands respect; not someone who tosses around names and acts like a child when he doesn't get his way.  After all we are now seeing Trump threatening that he may actually run third party if the GOP doesn't start treating him fairly.  On what grounds can he speak about fair behavior when we see him mock handicapped people and belittle nearly every single individual vying for the GOP nomination to become president?

Along Comes Ted Cruz

While everyone was pandering over Trump and his recent statements about how he intends to keep Islamic terrorists from entering the United States, Texas Senator Ted Cruz was busy running a campaign rooted in fundamental principles on how he intends to implement his policies.

According to Brietbart,

Cruz has 31 percent support, followed by Donald Trump with 21 percent. Since October, Cruz has gained 21 points while Trump has gained just 2 percent. Neurosurgeon Ben Carson is in 3rd place with 13 percent, down 15 points since October. Florida

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) 79% is 4th with 10 percent support, essentially unchanged since the last poll.

Are people beginning to wake up to Trump and his antics?  This aforementioned pole is a fantastic indicator that people are fed up with Trump and his whining that if he isn’t treated fairly he’ll leave the party.  While that may strike fear into many traditional Republican voters, I feel that the core of the Republican party today stands on clear morals and values and they are able to see right through everything Trump says and understand there isn’t really any substance behind the rhetoric.

That substance that Trump lacks Cruz makes up for and a prime example of this is explained here,

There were two other campaign developments this week, however, that perhaps go even further to explain the strong support coalescing behind Cruz. On Thursday, Cruz gave a speech focused on foreign policy at the Heritage Foundation. Echoing Ronald Reagan and Jeanne Kirkpatrick, Cruz outlined a robust strategy to combat radical terrorism without miring the US in overseas conflicts.

This is what we need, in a candidate who can literally back up what he says with methods and policies depicting how he will carry out his plan. Ted Cruz understands the Constitution and the responsibility of holding the highest office in the land.  He doesn’t just speak on platitudes, he speaks about the issuing we face as a nation and provides detailed outlines of how he intends to address those issues .  The next time you see Trump on CNN, MSNBC, Good Morning America, Fox News, or anywhere else spouting off trying to keep himself in the limelight think to yourself, does this man really have a plan for this country or is he all talk?

-Young Conservative

Syrians at our Southern Border

Why bother going out of the way to bring the Syrian refugees here?  They're already making their way here via our porous southern border.  We hear Trump go on and on about how lax the security is at our southern border and although I don't always agree with his bombastic attitude he is definitely right on this one.  It's no secret that we basically do not have a border between us and Mexico and Mexico with do nothing to stop illegal immigrants from using their country as a transportation hub to get to America.

According to a recent post on Brietbart,

Two federal agents operating under the umbrella of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are claiming that eight Syrian illegal aliens attempted to enter Texas from Mexico in the Laredo Sector. The federal agents spoke with Breitbart Texas on the condition of anonymity, however, a local president of the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) confirmed that Laredo Border Patrol agents have been officially contacting the organization with concerns over reports from other federal agents about Syrians illegally entering the country in the Laredo Sector. The reports have caused a stir among the sector’s Border Patrol agents.

The sources claimed that eight Syrians were apprehended on Monday, November 16, 2015. According to the sources, the Syrians were in two separate “family units” and were apprehended at the Juarez Lincoln Bridge in Laredo, Texas, also known officially as Port of Entry 1.

Of course they were apprehended in two separate “family units”!  They had to be apprehended in such a manner as to continue to tug on the heartstrings of Americans that individuals crossing our southern border are just women and children looking for a better life.  How dare we even consider restricting not letting this poor huddled masses yearning to be free into our great nation.  This is the card liberals play on conservatives who actually stand for the rule of law and realize the possible threat that unfettered immigration into this country poses to every single American citizen.  Couple that with the threat faced with ISIS and the importance of screening every single individual that enters this country is compounded tenfold.

As if this more recent incident isn’t enough rewind back to September and Brietbart reported on another incident regarding Syrian migrants attempting to cross the southern border.

According to Brietbart back in September,

Officers with U.S. Customs and Border Protection arrested 27-year-old Walaa Alrehawi and her brother-in-law 46-year-old Mohammad Ziad Alzalam last week in the border city of Hidalgo.

On Monday, the two went before U.S. Magistrate Judge Dorina Ramos, who read them their rights and ordered they be held without bond pending a detention hearing later this week.

Court records obtained by Breitbart Texas revealed that Ziad travelled to Beirut, Lebanon, to pick up Alrehawi who has been identified as his sister-in-law. She allegedly used the passport belonging to Ziad’s wife to fly to Frankfurt, Germany. From there, the two flew to the Mexican resort town of Cancun. The duo eventually made their way to the Mexican city of Reynosa and subsequently tried to enter the United States through Hidalgo.

In this incident we see two individuals who attempt to use fake passports to gain entrance into the United States.  This is the same type of scenario that played out in Paris when the islamists, one of which was tied to the Syrian refugee population, who allegedly arrived in France using a fake passport.

I know many are running around crying about how ignorant it is for us to turn away anyone who may want to come here.  There are a few things that one must take into consideration though before rushing to such judgement.  Given the aforementioned events that have unfolded not only in Paris but with regards to Syrians attempting to enter the United States illegally, it is essential we remain skeptical.  Additionally, our vetting process is under great scrutiny from all levels of government including the FBI, and other law enforcement agencies. Lastly, do we really have the resources at this point to take care of upwards of 80,000 more people in this country?  We cannot even take care of our veterans and we want to import more people who will inevitably be a burden to the already overloaded welfare system.

-Young Conservative

Patriot Insight: Phil Williams Show Notes for November 20th

Patriot Insight: Phil Williams Show

Show Notes 11/20

Syrian Refugees

There will always be people attempting to come to this country and part of the reason is because we do have values we refer to as American values and a rule of law unlike many other countries around the world. Just look at what is going on in Europe, they have succumb to political correctness and acceptance of everyone and they are simply becoming one giant landmass. Different countries used to have varying cultures and values, yet with the rampant catering to Islamic beliefs to avoid offending them many countries are losing their identity. Just look at the no go zones found found throughout Europe.

According to National Review Online,

On January 11, Emerson said they “exist throughout Europe. . . . They’re places where the governments — like France, Britain, Sweden, Germany — don’t exercise any sovereignty. . . . You basically have zones where sharia courts were set up, where Muslim density is very intense, where the police don’t go in, and where it’s basically a separate country almost, a country within a country.”

Although Emerson, whom I admire for his moral courage and investigative skills, immediately apologized for his “terrible error” of saying that cities such as Birmingham, England, “are totally Muslim where non-Muslims just simply don’t go,” he did not address the larger question of whether no-go zones, in fact, do “exist throughout Europe” and are places where governments “don’t exercise any sovereignty.”

If you ask me what is really at the heart of the matter with regards to the Syrian Refugees is the fact that many liberals hate what America stands for.  They constantly speak about “fundamental transformation” and we are finally getting a true glimpse into what that fundamental transformation includes.  Obama and his cronies are determined to put us on a level playing field with the rest of the world.  No longer is America exceptional, no longer is America the shining beacon on the hill, we are now becoming no better than the countries in Europe being overrun by radical islamic extremists.

What are refugees getting when they come here, who's paying for it?

These downtrodden refugees, you know the women and children that Obama keeps lecturing us about, even though the videos and pictures we see show predominantly men streaming across the borders into Europe, don’t really appear to be hurting all that bad.  Many have cell phones, nice clothes, and the like.

Let’s get at one of the real reasons these individuals want to come here so badly.  They know damn well what will be offered them once they arrive. Just like the illegal aliens streaming across the border know, these so called refugees know that once they get here they will be place at the front of the line before anyone else waiting for government assistance, namely the Veterans. We have thousands of Veterans waiting for care at VA hospitals, veterans waiting for all types of assistance yet we are concerning ourselves with bringing into the country upwards of 100,000 more people who will simple leech off of the system.  

According to a November 17th Associated Press piece,

HOW MANY PEOPLE:

Currently 70,000 refugees from around the world are allowed to come to the United States. The U.S. will accept 85,000 people in 2016 and 100,000 in 2017. People fleeing Syria will account for much of the increase, though not all.

Although more than half of U.S. governors have objected to plans to resettle Syrian refugees in the United States, with some declaring that they won't allow resettlement in their states, the federal government controls resettlement programs. State authorities have no legal authority to bar refugees from moving to their jurisdictions.

___

HOUSING AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE:

Upon arrival in the United States, each refugee is eligible for a $1,975 arrival and placement grant that is managed by one of nine refugee resettlement agencies working with the federal government. At least $1,125 of that grant must be spent on housing, including a bed for each person, basic furniture such as a couch, kitchen items including dishes and silverware, and weather-appropriate clothing. The remainder is used to cover additional costs for the aid agency.

Low-income refugee families with children may be eligible for temporary assistance for needy families, a welfare program in which state rules govern eligibility and the amount of money families receive, for up to five years. Immigrants without children or otherwise not eligible for the temporary assistance program qualify for the refugee cash assistance program run by the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement. Eligibility for that program lasts eight months.

HEALTH CARE:

Low-income refugees may be eligible for Medicaid for up to seven years. While immigrants to the U.S. are not generally eligible for Medicaid, refugees invited to move to the U.S. are exempt. Each state determines which refugees meet the eligibility requirements. Those who don't qualify for Medicaid can receive refugee medical assistance for up to eight months.

___

WORK:

Refugees must register with the Social Security Administration after arrival and are almost immediately eligible for a work permit. Social services, including job placement programs, are available to refugees for up to five years.

___

OTHER ASSISTANCE:

Low-income refugees may also be eligible for food-assistance programs.

Cloward Piven overwhelming the system

According to Wikipedia,

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty"

The ultimate objective of this strategy—to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income—will be questioned by some. Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.

"Conservative Republicans are always ready to declaim the evils of public welfare, and they would probably be the first to raise a hue and cry. But deeper and politically more telling conflicts would take place within the Democratic coalition...Whites – both working class ethnic groups and many in the middle class – would be aroused against the ghetto poor, while liberal groups, which until recently have been comforted by the notion that the poor are few... would probably support the movement. Group conflict, spelling political crisis for the local party apparatus, would thus become acute as welfare rolls mounted and the strains on local budgets became more severe.

One would literally have to be blind to not see this coming at this point.  The liberal elite are getting fed up with you and me as we wise up to what is going on and they must do whatever they can to silence us, even if it means to manufacture a crisis.  Just think of what they would do with the perfectly implemented manufactured crisis.  Not only could they take over the economy, they could implement martial law, restrict movement of people about the country, and practically run our lives on a day to day basis.

-Young Conservative

Stop Catering to the Illegal Alien

Enough is enough! I'm sick and tired of the left trying to reconfigure the English language to avoid “offending” people. We are seeing the pussification of our society through the guise of political correctness run amok. This mentality is coming from those in the mainstream media and is being driven by the liberals in government. The underlying principle (if you want to call it that) is the idea that if the ruling class can eliminate anything that makes one person different from another they can essentially make us all the same. You are no better than the other guy regardless of how hard you work or the sacrifices you make, you don't deserve to reap the benefits of your labor. After all it's simply not fair that you should have excess when those in the flat ass society who don't work, who don't put forth any effort to earn the things they want, have nothing.

This idea couldn't be more relevant when it comes to illegal… (yes I said ILLEGAL, because when you break a law that makes what you're doing illegal) aliens! When an individual enters our country without going through the proper immigration process they are breaking our immigration laws. Yet to the Democrats they are simply “dreamers”, and now the director of housing and urban development Rep. Joaquín Castro (D-Texas) is putting in motion a bill in which illegal aliens would have to be referred to as “undocumented foreign national”.

According to The Hill,

"America is a nation of immigrants, yet our federal government continues to use terms that dehumanize and ostracize those in our society who happen to have been born elsewhere," Castro said in a release.

"Regardless of status, immigrants to our nation are first and foremost human beings. Removing the term 'alien' from our federal laws shows respect to our shared heritage and to the hundreds of millions of descendants of immigrants who call America home."

Let's break this down for what I like to call the wrong information voter. I agree our nation is indeed a nation of immigrants, immigrants who arrived here legally and abided by the current immigration statutes that were applicable when they arrived here. If we begin to break down the immigration laws that help us to remain a sovereign nation what will we be left with? We will simply be a land with no borders, we will no longer have a country as we will simply occupy a space once known as the United States of America! Then again that is the end game of the liberal elitist. Their ultimate goal is for us all to become citizens of the “world”. Hence why they demean and belittle anyone who shows true pride in America and truly believes American exceptionalism!

If you are born elsewhere and would like to come to America believe me we would live to have you. All we ask is that you abide by our laws and come here legally. I agree we are all human beings and deserve to be treated with respect, which is why no one individual deserves to be placed at the front of the line in front of those who are going through the immigration process in a legal manner. If we are truly all created equal why are those like Julian Castro prioritizing the ILLEGAL ALIEN?

It's quite some because they know they can manipulate them and use them to their advantage. The liberal elitist ruling class doesn't have the best intentions of the individual at heart. They know if they can just get the illegal aliens here and find a way to guilt the American people into accepting amnesty they will have a virtually unlimited supply of new voters. Voters they they can promise an unlimited supply of free crap to paid for by you guessed it, the American taxpayer!

Welcome to the North American Union formerly known as the United States, Canada, Mexico, and the countries that make up Central and South America. We will all be equally miserable if the liberal elitist get their way because after all socialism if for the people, never the socialist!

-Young Conservative 

Appeals Court Hears Challenges on Obama's Unconstitutional Immigration Policy

I would love for one person to make a valid argument with regards to where Obama gets the authority to arbitrarily determine who is granted citizenship and who is not.  

According to Article 1, Section 8, Claus 4 of the United States Constitution, 

"The Congress shall have the power to establish a uniform rule of naturalization."

As one can clearly see, although the President can't seem to see this, the power of naturalization and in effect the subsequent dealings with immigration and naturalization as a whole lies in Congress, not in the hands of the President.  Bottom line is the actions by this president to take it upon himself to move forward with immigration policy without first consulting Congress is unconstitutional and an impeachable offense. 

 Don't be fooled by this President's excuse that he must act because Congress won't.  It doesn't matter whether or not Congress is acting or coming to a resolution on something the President decides is important.  He simply does not have the power to take over the powers of Congress.

Today we are seeing the 5th circuit court of appeals take up arguments over the validity of Obama's proposed immigration reform.  The mere fact that it has come to this is absolutely ridiculous! The government is wasting tax payer’s money debating whether or not Obama can deliberately act outside the confines of the Constitution. 

According to ABC News, 

A coalition of 26 states, led by Texas sued to block the plan. The hearing was on an appeal of a Texas judge's injunction.

The Justice Department argued that Texas has no legal standing in the matter. Texas' solicitor general countered that granting legal status to immigrants will be costly for Texas.

The judges did not rule and took the case under advisement.

It is quite clear that more than half of the states are extremely concerned with the possible effects of this proposed immigration reform.  If the immigration reform were to go through it would have a hug effect on the states as the federal government plans on putting the burden of taking care of the illegals solely on the states.  

The states will have to deal with providing schooling for the millions of new illegal alien students, the states will have to deal with health concerns brought here by individuals from third world countries, and the states will have to deal with issuing these illegal aliens credentials that should only be provided to United States citizens.

ABC News then goes on to explain,

Benjamin Mizer, the Justice Department's principal deputy assistant attorney general, called Texas' suit unprecedented and argued that immigration policy is a domain of the federal government.

The whole reason the Texas suit is "unprecedented" is because the actions of this President are also unprecedented.  Never before has a president taken it upon himself to rule on immigration policy.  And don't talk to me about Reagan, the immigration bill that he signed into law back in 1986 was drafted and passed by Congress.  Therefore the immigration reform was Constitutional. 

Yes immigration reform is a domain of the federal government as stated by Benjamin Mizer, it's just not a domain of the office of the President.

Young Conservative

@Steve0423

Facebook.com/WhyTheLeftIsntRight

RebelMouse.com/YoungConservative

#tcot #RedNationRising #PJNET 

Illegal Immigrants Becoming Police Officers

Yes, your eyes aren't deceiving you! Arrangements are being made to allow those who have come here illegally, aka illegal aliens, are now being offered the opportunity to gain employment in police departments within the United States. This is the point of no return as individuals who have broken our federal immigration laws are now being handed a badge and told they must enforce our laws on American citizens. 

According to USA Today,

"Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, said he has no problems with green-card holders becoming police officers because they've made a long-term commitment to the country and have undergone extensive background checks. But he worries about the security risks associated with allowing any immigrant with a work permit to become an officer, especially considering that the Obama administration has given hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants work permits."

So the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies has no problems with what he refers to as green-card holders becoming police officers? He then goes on to say he is concerned with the security risks associated with allowing any immigrant with a work permit to become an officer, especially ones who have been handed work permits by the Obama administration! 

 Krikorian then goes on to explain,

"We're handing over a gun and a badge to somebody whose background we don't really know a lot about."

Wake up people! We are handing badges and guns to people whom we know nothing about.  Many of these illegal aliens are murderers, drug smugglers, gang members, etc., and simply because they have a "work permit" they all of the sudden have the credentials to become law enforcement officers?  

What is even more scary is the fact that these people who are here illegally have no allegiance to this country, the laws, or the Constitution.  As a result they are exactly what Obama needs to do his bidding. They are the "civilian security force" he spoke of some six years ago!

Young Conservative
@Steve0423
Facebook.com/WhyTheLeftIsntRight
RebelMouse.com/YoungConservative
#tcot #RedNationRising #PJNET

8th Grade Social Studies Teacher Assigns Pro Illegal-Immigration Homework Assignment

It's safe to say the federal education system in this country is becoming a resource for the left to indoctrinate our youth in their progressive ideologies. Long gone are the days of teaching children to think for themselves and fostering an environment in which children are given the tools to develop independent thought processes. Kids today are being fed a steady stream of liberal progressive propaganda that is literally ruining the minds that will shape tomorrow and the future of this country.

A prime example of just how the federal educational system is ruining young minds was evident in an 8th grade social studies assignment recently given to students at Shattuck Middle School in Wisconsin. This particular assignment dealt with immigration policy and how each part is "supposedly handling" the situation.

According to IJReview.com,

The homework, assigned by 8th grade Social Studies teacher Grace Davis, featured a political cartoon with a clearly labeled Democrat laying bricks to convey the building of a “pathway to citizenship,” while the Republican-labeled character is removing the bricks, effectively dismantling any immigration process. The cartoon is originally from the Chattanooga Times Free Press, not the teacher’s own creation.

The assignment then directs the children to fill out a series of questions about immigration policy, using the cartoon as a reference. The homework assignment asks:

1. Who are the men in the picture (What is their job? Look at what they are doing for a hint)
2. What are they building?
3. What do the symbols on their shirts represent?
4. What is action being done by each man?
5. What might this mean to us about immigration and citizenship?

Make what you want of this assignment but it is plain to see that it is intended to mold the young minds in such a way that the Democrats are "building the pathway to citizenship" while Republicans are tearing it down.  This is the kind of muck that is being taught to our children?  This is the muck that our tax dollars are paying for?

Rather than teaching children that one party is doing one thing and the other party doing something different, why aren't we teaching children the Constitution and making them aware of their rights. Teach kids how this country was founded. Teach them what true immigration was and how immigrants made their way here for a better life and the processes they had to endure to make it here.

Young Conservative
@Steve0423
Facebook.com/WhyTheLeftIsntRight
#tcot #rednationrising

Treat Illegal Aliens Like Tax Cheats

Providing amnesty to 5 million low skilled, uneducated migrants is going to do absolutely nothing for this country or the citizenry!!

All it is going to is reduce the opportunities for Americans be increasing the number of individuals already competing for the scarce number of available jobs. In addition to that it will inevitably overwhelm the welfare state, the educational system, and healthcare system.

But what are we going to do??? We can't just round them up and send them back even though Roosevelt had absolutely no problem rounding up American citizens simply for being of Japanese desent. An American president rounded up actual American citizens and placed them in concentration camps yet we can't just locate those who are here illegally and send them back to their country of origin!

Suppose 5 million citizens opted not to pay their taxes?? Do you think the govt would simply say ahh that's too many people we can't go after 5 million citizens who didn't pay their taxes...

Wrong, they'd be rounding citizens up fast enough to make your head spin and throwing them in jail. So it's about time we take that same approach to immigration. Send back those who are here illegally, streamline the LEGAL immigration process, and in the mean time patrol the damn border to keep Americans safe!

Young Conservative
@Steve0423
Facebook.com/whytheleftisntright
#tcot #RedNationRising

Indonesia Declares Outright Ban on ISIS and Their Supporters

IIt's is quite sad when the United States of America isn't able to forcibly declare a ban on a terrorist group like ISIS all the while a country that contains nearly 10% of the world's Muslim population has just done so. Political correctness and the cowardice of the liberal progressive left has lead this country to a point in which they can no longer see evil for what it is.

According to the Christian Post,

"Swearing an oath and pledging allegiance to a foreign nation or part of a foreign nation could make an Indonesian lose his/her citizenship," stated Saifuddin earlier this month."

Would we ever come close to considering this type of action here? The answer is absolutely not because with our open border and the idea that everyone can come here regardless of whether or not your a terrorist has infiltrated the highest office in the land.

Even with a group like ISIS taking over more and more of the middle east, those here in this country still fail to call evil for what it is. Instead we drop a little bit of food and water and a few bombs and call it a day. It's going to take far more than that to defeat the ISIS militants who are securely entrenched in the areas that we once cleared of terrorists.

Young Conservative
@steve0423
facebook.com/whytheleftisntright

Holding Illegal Immigrant Children for Ransom

The border crisis has been taking place now for months and the general public and news media have been well aware of the situation for roughly two months. While this is the case,  we have yet to see any real resolution or even concrete ideas of how to resolve the problem.  It would appear there is something more evil,  something more nefarious going on here and with the likes of Obama and Reid in charge those accusations aren't all that far fetched!

These accusations were brought to the forefront as Senator Ted Cruz sat down to speak with Chris Wallace, 

“I’ll tell you who is holding these kids ransom: It’s Harry Reid and the president,” Cruz said. “Because their view is: Don’t do anything to fix the problem.”

This makes perfect sense considering the border crisis has since become a humanitarian crisis as we are seeing children being treated like rats. These children are tossed into cages and carted around the country like pawns in some sort of game. The president even visited Texas on a recent fund raising trip and simply could not find the time to go anywhere near the border to survey the crisis he is in large part responsible for.

At this point one can only hope that the American people are beginning to wake up to what is going on as we are seeing these illegal immigrants to being transported all over the country. They are being placed in cities and towns without first notifying residents. In many instances even local govt and local law enforcement aren't even aware these illegals are being housed in their town. We can only hope people wake up before it's too late!!

-YOUNG CONSERVATIVE
@Steve0423

Chart Topping Song Encouraging Illegals to Board the Death Train to America

A disturbing trend is occurring in Mexico as one song in particular had risen to the top of the music charts. This song is directly related to the government imposed humanitarian crisis we have been seeing take place at the Mexican border for months. The song is entitled "La Bestia"  which was written in commemoration of the so called death train that many illegals are boarding to make their way across the border into the United States.  

This is part of the problem we now face with the influx of not only children, but adults, pregnant women, gang members, and whatever else may be making their way into this country.  Our president and government been providing central American countries including Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador with the notion that if they come here they will not be sent home and in many cases they will be provided with housing, food, clothing, and more. 

So not only do we have to worry about our own government encouraging illegal aliens to cross our border into this country, we also have to be concerned with the culture of illegal immigration.  It has come to a point in many of the central American countries that their own pop culture is laying the ground work of the mentality that if they can make it to America they will be completely taken care of. 

This goes against everything this country stands for.  Yes we were a country founded on immigrants but those immigrants came here in search of a better life in which they could work for themselves without any government oppression.  They came here with just the clothes on their backs not looking for a handout but looking at how they could contribute to this country.  What we are seeing on the southern border is the exact opposite. We are seeing people make their way into this country in search of handouts and freebies at the expense of the American Citizen. 

ILLEGAL... It's the New "N" Word

The liberal progressive nut jobs have been perpetuating this war on language for quite some time now. Every so often there is a new word or phrase within the English language that they for one reason or another deem offensive.  These words or phrases encompass a wide variety topics from the #BanBossy campaign to the recent "You Throw Like a Girl" campaign. 

These crazy crack pots have recently taken their offense of the English language to an entirely new level with the recent diatribe by progressive commentator Sally Kohn in a recent CNN column in which she term "Illegal" to both the word "f***ot" and "n***er. 

She opened her column with,

"During the civil rights era, Alabama Gov. George Wallace was asked by a supporter why he was fixated on the politics of race. Wallace replied, "You know, I tried to talk about good roads and good schools and all these things that have been part of my career, and nobody listened. And then I began talking about n*ggers, and they stomped the floor.

In the 1980s, during the rise of the gay rights movement, North Carolina Sen. Jesse Helms accused a political opponent for supporting "f*ggots, perverts [and] sexual deviates of this nation."

Today, opponents of immigration reform attack undocumented immigrants as "illegal immigrants." Even worse, like anti-immigration extremists, some prominent elected officials use the term "illegals." Maine Gov. Paul LePage, a Republican, said, "I urge all Mainers to tell your city councilors and selectmen to stop handing out your money to illegals."

Not the same thing? Of course it is."

Have we really come to a point in this country in which we are comparing people who have come here ILLEGALLY to those movements for the equality of individuals who were discriminated against who were here legally.  Referring to those that come here illegally is simply stating a fact, THEY ARE HERE ILLEGALLY.  When you enter a store after that store has closed you are do so ILLEGALLY.  Therefore you are an illegal occupant of that store.  When you break into a house that is not yours you are illegally entering that house.  There is no argument here. These people have entered this country illegally and arrangements should be made to send them back and secure the damn border. 

Young Conservative

@Steve0423

 

The New York Is Home Act, Giving Illegals the Rights of Citizens

As reported on Yahoo News!, a New York Senator named Gustavo Rivera, is attempting to push a bill through the New York Senate that would essentially give illegal aliens living in New York City and State many of the rights we as citizens are awarded. One of these rights includes the right to vote in both local and state elections. Senator Rivera explains, "Nearly 3 million people in the state of New York currently reside here and make New York their home, but can't fully participate in civic, political, and economic life."  

What the senator fails to touch on is the fact that these individuals are here illegally.  As a result they are not to be awarded the same rights of a citizen. We are quickly becoming a nation of residents as one of my favorite radio talk show hosts, Andrew Wilkow, loves to say.  This government under Obama is blurring the line between the citizen and the illegal alien in an effort to make us a nation of residents.  This will in turn give them the millions of votes they need to keep their foothold in Washington. 

People throughout the country are beginning to wake up to the antics of Obama and is cronies.  This is why we are seeing their political machine going into overdrive.  They are flooding the southern border with illegal immigrant children in an effort to overwhelm the system.  They are also attempting to play on the heart strings of Americans as they pit these children against the American people.  This tactic is no different than ones used by dictators throughout history, just look at what Hitler did during the time of Nazi Germany as he pitted the children against the people and indoctrinated them into believing his rhetoric.  This is playing out before our very eyes and many are too stupid to even realize it.

Mr. Rivera also goes on to explain, "With failure at the national level on comprehensive immigration reform, the question we have asked is what can states do?" Well Mr. Rivera the states cannot do a single thing as policies with regards immigration and naturalization fall strictly within the confines of the federal government. Section 1 of the 14^th amendment of the U.S. Constitution states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”   There you go Mr. Rivera, you and your state cannot do a single thing with regards to immigration and if you attempt to do so you should be impeached from office and thrown in prison.

-Young Conservative

@Steve0423