Showing posts with label Constitutional Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitutional Law. Show all posts

Friday, February 10, 2017

Tell the 9th Circuit to Stick It!!

As you know by now the activist judges on the 9th circuit have upheld the suspension of Trump’s immigration ban.  While that may sound like a great move if you're watching Good Morning America, MSNBC, Meet the Press, or any of those other mainstream media wack job collaborations, they couldn’t be further off the deep end. So many today have become brainwashed into believing everything that is fed to them by these morons and they have no understanding of the Constitution or the rule of law.  The rule of law that Trump spoke about throughout his campaign and continues to speak about as President.


This failed understanding of the Constitution and lack of knowledge when it comes to civics can be attributed largely to the educational system in this country.  Kids today come out of school knowing more about the Kardashians than they do about who the first President of this country was or the system of government we all live under.  We even hear many millennials spout off at the mouth about how this country is a “democracy” when in reality we are a Constitutional republic and majority doesn’t always rule! If kids and even adults understood how our government is designed to function they would realize that there are three co-equal branches of government, the legislative, judicial, and executive.  Each of which is designed to be a check to the other creating a balance between the three.  


Many are arguing that the 9th circuit was merely checking the President’s power when it comes to his recent immigration order.  That could not possibly be further from the truth as the power over immigration lies solely in the hands of Congress and the President. Congress may make laws regarding immigration while the President, according to a 1952 immigration bill, has the power to determine which (non-citizens) we let into this country, where they originate from, and how many people we decide to let it. The President can even go as far as to restrict immigration based upon just about whatever he so chooses, he can even restrict immigration based upon religion (aaahhhh the horror).






The law passed in 1952 states,


Speaking in the Senate on March 2, 1953, McCarran said:[4]
I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization and if this oasis of the world shall be overrun, perverted, contaminated or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions which have been made to our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors.


However, we have in the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into the American way of life, but which, on the contrary are its deadly enemies. Today, as never before, untold millions are storming our gates for admission and those gates are cracking under the strain.


The solution of the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en masse to the United States. ... I do not intend to become prophetic, but if the enemies of this legislation succeed in riddling it to pieces, or in amending it beyond recognition, they will have contributed more to promote this nation's downfall than any other group since we achieved our independence as a nation.


There you have it! It doesn’t take a law degree to grasp the fact that our country has been facing issues with illegal immigration since its inception and we continue to face those same issues today.  The problem today is that the Democrats and all liberals seem to cherry pick which laws they want to enforce and or abide by and which laws they simply disregard.  This is why we are so lucky to have Trump in office.  Trump clearly believes in the rule of law and is willing to hold those who do not uphold the rule of law accountable.  The problem is we need to get the masses to understand that the rule of law still does exist and we all must be sure our leaders are upholding said rules whether they agree with them or not.


Steve Janiszak
Young Conservative
@Steve0423


Saturday, March 21, 2015

Maxine Waters Promotes Sharia Law in America

We constantly hear about sharia law and whether or not it should be allowed in the United States.  This is a topic that shouldn't even be up for debate in this country as we have a document that provides the outline for law and order in this country, the Constitution.  Within this document it is stated that government shall,

"Make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

As a result any attempt at implementing sharia law in the United States wouldn't simply be unlawful, it would be unconstitutional.  The problem here is that our own president no longer abides by the Constitution as he arbitrarily enforces laws, enforces only portions of laws that benefit his agenda, takes it upon himself to nationalize individuals who arrive in this country illegally, and the list goes on. As a result, how can you expect those the like of Maxine Waters to know what the Constitution is, let alone the Constitutional laws she is breaking by advocating the implementation of sharia law in America. 


In this video the pathetic Maxine Waters speaks about our Constitution and religious freedom. As stated before the Constitution gives us the freedom of religion and not the freedom from religion.  As a result Muslims, Christians, Jews, and anyone of faith has the right to practice their religion so long as it is not taking away the rights and freedoms of another individual.  This is where this morons stance on sharia law comes into play.  
According to DCClothesLine.com,
Islam means to change the very culture you live in and the laws you live under America. If you have any doubts, understand that a current imam at the Islamic Society of Orange County and former president of the Islamic Society of North America, Muzammil H. Siddiqi, issued this fatwa on Islamonline.net (the link has now dead, but did find it in theweb archives here).

“It is true that Islam stands for the sovereignty of Allah the Almighty and Allah’s rules are not limited to the acts of worship, they also include social, economic and political matters. By participating in a non-Islamic system, one cannot rule by that which Allah has commanded. But things do not change overnight. Changes come through patience, wisdom and hard work.

I believe that as Muslims, we should participate in the system to safeguard our interests and try to bring gradual change for the right cause, the cause of truth and justice. We must not forget that Allah’s rules have to be established in all lands, and all our efforts should lead to that direction.” 

If sharia law requires that everyone abide by it then how is that considered free?  I would love for the oh so intelligent, understanding, and culturally diverse, Maxine Waters explain to us just how that type of law is indeed Constitutional.  How does a law which basically implements a mandatory religion within this country work in accordance with the religious freedom we are guaranteed by our Constitution? 


"She then went on to quote the Southern Poverty Law Center, who claims that “hate groups” are at an all-time high. It’s funny that they don’t list themselves as a hate group. Since they failed to do so, I’ll just add them to my list of hate groups. But Waters went on to say the “radical right” terrorism was growing. As of yet, I haven’t seen them fly planes into buildings or behead their enemies."

This couldn't be more true with regards to the entire misguided notion of hate groups in this country.  Maxine complains about how people are racially profiled in this country and how it has to end.  I agree that people should not be profiled solely based upon their race, but if race helps to separate a possible perpetrator from other individuals, then why couldn't race be used in conjunction with a whole list of other qualifications as part of the reason to so much as question an individual.  I am by no means saying round up Americans of a specific race or religion and intern them like the liberal hero FDR did. What I am saying is that if a person of interest happens to be of a specific race or religion that shouldn't be disregarded when attempting to locate the suspect.

The bottom line is that if we follow down the road Maxine Waters is outlining we will inevitably see the destruction of the Constitution and the end of this country as we know it.  We must not let sharia law become common place in American society as doing so goes against everything the founding fathers stood for with regards to freedom of religion and freedom in general.  The fight against radical islam is coming here whether we like it or not and the sooner Americans wake up to it and quash it while we still can, the better off we'll all be.

Young Conservative
@Steve0423 
Facebook.com/WhyTheLeftIsntRight
http://www.rebelmouse.com/youngconservative 
#tcot #RedNationgRising #pjnet